home
products
support
blog
about
login
Group Email Manager
login
signup
Home
Scheme Reports
Archive index November 2012
Date Index - November 2012 - Scheme Reports
Search:
Search
« October
Archive index
By threads
Refresh
December »
03 Nov 2012 04:49 UTC
[Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
Per Bothner
03 Nov 2012 05:57 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
Per Bothner
10 Nov 2012 06:30 UTC
[scheme-reports-wg1] R7RS 7th draft available
Alex Shinn
10 Nov 2012 09:57 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
Takashi Kato
10 Nov 2012 10:25 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
Takashi Kato
10 Nov 2012 18:13 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
Alan Watson
10 Nov 2012 19:07 UTC
[Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import
Per Bothner
10 Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
[Scheme-reports] the features function
Per Bothner
10 Nov 2012 20:13 UTC
[Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
Per Bothner
10 Nov 2012 21:05 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Missing #
Takashi Kato
10 Nov 2012 22:48 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] the features function
John Cowan
10 Nov 2012 22:51 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
John Cowan
11 Nov 2012 02:47 UTC
Re: Missing #
Arthur A. Gleckler
11 Nov 2012 03:13 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
Alex Shinn
11 Nov 2012 03:56 UTC
Re: editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import
Arthur A. Gleckler
11 Nov 2012 03:59 UTC
Re: meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
Arthur A. Gleckler
11 Nov 2012 04:25 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
John Cowan
11 Nov 2012 17:13 UTC
[Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
Takashi Kato
11 Nov 2012 17:29 UTC
Re: **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
Arthur A. Gleckler
11 Nov 2012 17:54 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
Takashi Kato
12 Nov 2012 04:30 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit>
David Adler
12 Nov 2012 04:42 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Mark H Weaver
12 Nov 2012 05:05 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
12 Nov 2012 06:34 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Per Bothner
12 Nov 2012 06:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
Per Bothner
12 Nov 2012 06:56 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
Alex Shinn
12 Nov 2012 13:53 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Noah Lavine
12 Nov 2012 14:04 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit>
Alex Shinn
12 Nov 2012 14:08 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
Alex Shinn
12 Nov 2012 15:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Mark H Weaver
12 Nov 2012 16:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
Per Bothner
12 Nov 2012 17:40 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Mark H Weaver
12 Nov 2012 17:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Ray Dillinger
12 Nov 2012 17:58 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Mark H Weaver
12 Nov 2012 18:10 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
John Cowan
12 Nov 2012 18:40 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 03:14 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 03:29 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 03:36 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 04:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 05:41 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 06:17 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alan Watson
13 Nov 2012 06:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
13 Nov 2012 23:04 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
John Cowan
14 Nov 2012 03:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
Aaron W. Hsu
14 Nov 2012 07:14 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Test suite
Helmut Eller
14 Nov 2012 07:28 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Test suite
Alex Shinn
14 Nov 2012 07:40 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alex Shinn
14 Nov 2012 07:53 UTC
[Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
14 Nov 2012 08:28 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Beta reduction
Helmut Eller
14 Nov 2012 08:51 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
14 Nov 2012 09:07 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
14 Nov 2012 10:22 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
14 Nov 2012 20:37 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
14 Nov 2012 21:06 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
14 Nov 2012 21:26 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
14 Nov 2012 21:39 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alan Watson
14 Nov 2012 22:19 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
15 Nov 2012 00:40 UTC
[Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
15 Nov 2012 07:44 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
15 Nov 2012 16:17 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Per Bothner
15 Nov 2012 16:23 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
15 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
15 Nov 2012 23:47 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Aaron W. Hsu
16 Nov 2012 01:16 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Shiro Kawai
16 Nov 2012 06:41 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alan Watson
16 Nov 2012 07:23 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
16 Nov 2012 07:34 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects
Alan Watson
16 Nov 2012 12:55 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Vassil Nikolov
16 Nov 2012 13:51 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Helmut Eller
16 Nov 2012 16:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Alex Shinn
16 Nov 2012 17:09 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
16 Nov 2012 18:04 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects
John Cowan
16 Nov 2012 21:29 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Noah Lavine
16 Nov 2012 22:15 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
16 Nov 2012 23:12 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
16 Nov 2012 23:52 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
John Cowan
17 Nov 2012 02:52 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Alex Shinn
17 Nov 2012 05:37 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
Vassil Nikolov
17 Nov 2012 13:04 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
John Cowan
17 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
Arthur Smyles
17 Nov 2012 16:45 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
Arthur Smyles
17 Nov 2012 20:30 UTC
Re: Name supported?
Arthur A. Gleckler
20 Nov 2012 03:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
20 Nov 2012 03:51 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
20 Nov 2012 06:37 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
Mark H Weaver
20 Nov 2012 09:01 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Ray Dillinger
20 Nov 2012 09:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Mark H Weaver
21 Nov 2012 07:50 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Mark H Weaver
21 Nov 2012 08:30 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Per Bothner
21 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alan Watson
22 Nov 2012 02:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Vassil Nikolov
22 Nov 2012 09:23 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Marijn
22 Nov 2012 09:40 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
22 Nov 2012 15:36 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
22 Nov 2012 18:39 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
22 Nov 2012 19:33 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
22 Nov 2012 23:20 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Mark H Weaver
22 Nov 2012 23:53 UTC
[Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Per Bothner
23 Nov 2012 01:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Shiro Kawai
23 Nov 2012 02:26 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
John Cowan
23 Nov 2012 02:40 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
23 Nov 2012 02:48 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Mark H Weaver
23 Nov 2012 05:54 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Mark H Weaver
23 Nov 2012 06:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alan Watson
23 Nov 2012 07:02 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech
Alex Shinn
23 Nov 2012 07:30 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Aaron W. Hsu
23 Nov 2012 07:37 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
John Cowan
23 Nov 2012 07:39 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Aaron W. Hsu
23 Nov 2012 07:49 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Shiro Kawai
23 Nov 2012 07:51 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Alex Shinn
23 Nov 2012 08:02 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
John Cowan
23 Nov 2012 08:50 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Per Bothner
23 Nov 2012 08:56 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Alex Shinn
23 Nov 2012 10:14 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library
Christian Stigen Larsen
23 Nov 2012 11:44 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library
Alex Shinn
23 Nov 2012 16:43 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Per Bothner
23 Nov 2012 22:10 UTC
[Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
23 Nov 2012 23:50 UTC
Re: let*-values' definition
Arthur A. Gleckler
24 Nov 2012 01:44 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
Alex Shinn
24 Nov 2012 02:00 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Ray Dillinger
24 Nov 2012 02:47 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Ray Dillinger
24 Nov 2012 03:08 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
Alex Shinn
24 Nov 2012 04:41 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
John Cowan
24 Nov 2012 18:18 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base)
John Cowan
24 Nov 2012 18:22 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules
John Cowan
24 Nov 2012 18:25 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete
John Cowan
24 Nov 2012 19:26 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment?
John Cowan
25 Nov 2012 02:27 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
John Cowan
25 Nov 2012 02:36 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
Mark H Weaver
25 Nov 2012 04:22 UTC
Re: Summary of Formal Comments and Objections
Arthur A. Gleckler
25 Nov 2012 12:02 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections
Peter Bex
25 Nov 2012 18:53 UTC
[scheme-reports-wg1] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft
John Cowan
25 Nov 2012 20:33 UTC
[Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
Per Bothner
26 Nov 2012 00:31 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
John Cowan
26 Nov 2012 01:17 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
John Cowan
26 Nov 2012 01:52 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
John Cowan
26 Nov 2012 02:11 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
Alex Shinn
26 Nov 2012 03:20 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
Per Bothner
26 Nov 2012 05:48 UTC
Re: formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
Arthur A. Gleckler
26 Nov 2012 06:04 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make
Mark H Weaver
26 Nov 2012 06:25 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
Mark H Weaver
26 Nov 2012 09:00 UTC
[Scheme-reports] More editorial comments
Alan Watson
26 Nov 2012 13:30 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments
Alex Shinn
26 Nov 2012 13:32 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
Sascha Ziemann
26 Nov 2012 13:41 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
Alex Shinn
26 Nov 2012 15:59 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
John Cowan
26 Nov 2012 16:31 UTC
[Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot
Mark H Weaver
26 Nov 2012 16:52 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot
John Cowan
26 Nov 2012 18:35 UTC
[scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence)
John Cowan
27 Nov 2012 02:42 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
Per Bothner
28 Nov 2012 03:04 UTC
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence)
Arthur A. Gleckler
28 Nov 2012 13:53 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
28 Nov 2012 13:54 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
Alan Watson
29 Nov 2012 23:35 UTC
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
Alex Shinn