On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Alex Shinn wrote:

>     In Section 5.2 says that a REPL should permit to redefine existing
>     definitions.  What should happen if a record definition is redefined?
>     Should existing record instances be considered instances of the new
>     type?
>
> Again, implementations differ here so there's not much
> we can say.  Smalltalk-style class redefinition is a nice
> feature, but fragile and not currently widely implemented.

You can say what "should" happen.

Helmut

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports