Date Index - October 2012 - Scheme Reports

11 Oct 2012 20:03 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..." John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:06 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #372: Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit) John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:06 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:10 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #421: #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case have no final delimiter John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:14 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #423: The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:19 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base) John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:23 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #430: clarify library loading rules John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:30 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #434: List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:33 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 20:39 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #436: Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 21:03 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #438: Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 21:08 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 22:03 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 22:06 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..." John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 22:19 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
11 Oct 2012 23:08 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible Alex Shinn
11 Oct 2012 23:08 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors Alex Shinn
11 Oct 2012 23:21 UTC [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics John Cowan
12 Oct 2012 01:29 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 01:46 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
12 Oct 2012 01:54 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
12 Oct 2012 02:11 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 02:17 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
12 Oct 2012 02:17 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Sam TH
12 Oct 2012 02:19 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
12 Oct 2012 02:21 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 02:26 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
12 Oct 2012 02:44 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 02:53 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
12 Oct 2012 03:56 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
12 Oct 2012 04:02 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Cowan
12 Oct 2012 04:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 04:27 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 04:55 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs John Boyle
12 Oct 2012 18:55 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Eli Barzilay
12 Oct 2012 19:01 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Eli Barzilay
13 Oct 2012 02:34 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
13 Oct 2012 02:37 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Vassil Nikolov
13 Oct 2012 02:38 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
13 Oct 2012 02:40 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs Aaron W. Hsu
13 Oct 2012 14:41 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber
13 Oct 2012 17:09 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Per Bothner
13 Oct 2012 20:57 UTC [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Marc Feeley
13 Oct 2012 21:09 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Jim Rees
14 Oct 2012 01:25 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Aaron W. Hsu
14 Oct 2012 01:34 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers Alex Shinn
14 Oct 2012 07:10 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
14 Oct 2012 11:36 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Michael Sperber
14 Oct 2012 18:42 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan
15 Oct 2012 18:11 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS Mark H Weaver
29 Oct 2012 08:15 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato
29 Oct 2012 08:44 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot John Cowan
29 Oct 2012 08:45 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
29 Oct 2012 08:53 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Alex Shinn
29 Oct 2012 09:15 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot Takashi Kato