Thread Index - November 2012 - Scheme Reports

[Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner (03 Nov 2012 04:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn (03 Nov 2012 04:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Per Bothner (03 Nov 2012 05:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function Alex Shinn (03 Nov 2012 06:21 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn (10 Nov 2012 06:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson (14 Nov 2012 07:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 07:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson (14 Nov 2012 17:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan (14 Nov 2012 20:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson (14 Nov 2012 21:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan (14 Nov 2012 22:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available Alan Watson (28 Nov 2012 13:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available John Cowan (17 Nov 2012 13:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato (10 Nov 2012 09:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn (10 Nov 2012 10:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Takashi Kato (10 Nov 2012 10:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn (10 Nov 2012 10:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Ray Dillinger (10 Nov 2012 10:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alan Watson (10 Nov 2012 18:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 Alex Shinn (11 Nov 2012 03:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7 John Cowan (11 Nov 2012 04:25 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 Anders Östlund (10 Nov 2012 18:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7 John Cowan (10 Nov 2012 18:45 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Per Bothner (10 Nov 2012 19:07 UTC)

Re: editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Nov 2012 03:56 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] the features function Per Bothner (10 Nov 2012 20:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] the features function John Cowan (10 Nov 2012 22:48 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner (10 Nov 2012 20:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan (10 Nov 2012 22:51 UTC)

Re: meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Nov 2012 03:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier John Cowan (11 Nov 2012 04:17 UTC)

Re: meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Nov 2012 04:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier Per Bothner (11 Nov 2012 04:24 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Missing # Takashi Kato (10 Nov 2012 21:05 UTC)

Re: Missing # Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Nov 2012 02:47 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato (11 Nov 2012 17:13 UTC)

Re: **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Nov 2012 17:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Takashi Kato (11 Nov 2012 17:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Per Bothner (12 Nov 2012 06:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted Alex Shinn (12 Nov 2012 14:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted John Cowan (12 Nov 2012 18:10 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (11 Nov 2012 19:53 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (12 Nov 2012 04:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Noah Lavine (12 Nov 2012 13:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (12 Nov 2012 15:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Ray Dillinger (12 Nov 2012 17:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 03:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (12 Nov 2012 17:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (12 Nov 2012 17:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 03:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 03:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (13 Nov 2012 05:21 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 05:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers Mark H Weaver (20 Nov 2012 06:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (12 Nov 2012 05:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner (12 Nov 2012 06:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (12 Nov 2012 07:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (12 Nov 2012 16:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (13 Nov 2012 02:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (13 Nov 2012 04:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (13 Nov 2012 04:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson (13 Nov 2012 06:17 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 06:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (20 Nov 2012 03:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (20 Nov 2012 03:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (20 Nov 2012 05:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (20 Nov 2012 06:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger (20 Nov 2012 09:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (20 Nov 2012 09:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Vassil Nikolov (22 Nov 2012 02:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger (24 Nov 2012 02:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 04:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (20 Nov 2012 22:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (21 Nov 2012 07:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Per Bothner (21 Nov 2012 08:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (21 Nov 2012 16:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson (21 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Marijn (22 Nov 2012 09:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (22 Nov 2012 09:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (22 Nov 2012 15:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (22 Nov 2012 17:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (22 Nov 2012 18:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (22 Nov 2012 19:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (22 Nov 2012 23:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 02:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (23 Nov 2012 02:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 03:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (23 Nov 2012 05:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson (23 Nov 2012 06:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger (24 Nov 2012 02:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alex Shinn (24 Nov 2012 03:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Ray Dillinger (24 Nov 2012 02:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 02:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Mark H Weaver (13 Nov 2012 06:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization Alan Watson (16 Nov 2012 06:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 17:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 06:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 04:33 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> David Adler (12 Nov 2012 04:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit> Alex Shinn (12 Nov 2012 14:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner (12 Nov 2012 06:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Alex Shinn (12 Nov 2012 06:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? Per Bothner (12 Nov 2012 16:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy? John Cowan (12 Nov 2012 18:40 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles (13 Nov 2012 22:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. John Cowan (13 Nov 2012 23:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles (13 Nov 2012 23:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 02:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Aaron W. Hsu (14 Nov 2012 03:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles (17 Nov 2012 16:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages. Arthur Smyles (17 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Test suite Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 07:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Test suite Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 07:28 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 07:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 08:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 08:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 09:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 09:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 09:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 10:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley (14 Nov 2012 21:06 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (14 Nov 2012 21:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley (14 Nov 2012 22:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 23:46 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson (15 Nov 2012 00:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Jim Rees (15 Nov 2012 02:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? John Cowan (15 Nov 2012 16:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] equal? Alan Watson (15 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC)

Re: equal? Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Nov 2012 20:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (15 Nov 2012 16:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Aaron W. Hsu (15 Nov 2012 23:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Shiro Kawai (16 Nov 2012 01:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (16 Nov 2012 07:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 19:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 21:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 23:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Alex Shinn (16 Nov 2012 22:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner (14 Nov 2012 21:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Marc Feeley (14 Nov 2012 21:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (15 Nov 2012 07:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL John Cowan (15 Nov 2012 16:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Per Bothner (15 Nov 2012 16:17 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (28 Nov 2012 13:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Stefan Edwards (28 Nov 2012 14:00 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 08:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction Alex Shinn (14 Nov 2012 08:37 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Name supported? Alan Watson (16 Nov 2012 07:05 UTC)

Re: Name supported? Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Nov 2012 20:30 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects Alan Watson (16 Nov 2012 07:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 18:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller (16 Nov 2012 08:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov (16 Nov 2012 12:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller (16 Nov 2012 13:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine (16 Nov 2012 13:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Vassil Nikolov (17 Nov 2012 05:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn (16 Nov 2012 16:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Helmut Eller (16 Nov 2012 17:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 17:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Noah Lavine (16 Nov 2012 21:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading John Cowan (16 Nov 2012 23:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading Alex Shinn (17 Nov 2012 02:52 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner (22 Nov 2012 23:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai (23 Nov 2012 01:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 07:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan (23 Nov 2012 02:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu (23 Nov 2012 07:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan (23 Nov 2012 07:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Aaron W. Hsu (23 Nov 2012 07:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Shiro Kawai (23 Nov 2012 07:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination John Cowan (23 Nov 2012 08:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner (23 Nov 2012 08:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 08:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Per Bothner (23 Nov 2012 16:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Alex Shinn (24 Nov 2012 01:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination Ray Dillinger (24 Nov 2012 03:17 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 07:02 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Christian Stigen Larsen (23 Nov 2012 10:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library Alex Shinn (23 Nov 2012 11:44 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition Jean-Michel HUFFLEN (23 Nov 2012 22:10 UTC)

Re: let*-values' definition Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Nov 2012 23:50 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #423: When does eqv? return #t for procedures? John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 18:12 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base) John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 18:18 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 18:22 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 18:25 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 19:12 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open? John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 19:15 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 19:21 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment? John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 19:26 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #456: Adoption of R6RS John Cowan (24 Nov 2012 19:39 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver (24 Nov 2012 22:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan (25 Nov 2012 02:27 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver (25 Nov 2012 02:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan (25 Nov 2012 02:47 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections John Cowan (25 Nov 2012 04:16 UTC)

Re: Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Arthur A. Gleckler (25 Nov 2012 04:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections Peter Bex (25 Nov 2012 12:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver (26 Nov 2012 00:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 00:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner (26 Nov 2012 00:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 01:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner (26 Nov 2012 02:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Alex Shinn (26 Nov 2012 02:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Per Bothner (26 Nov 2012 02:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS Mark H Weaver (26 Nov 2012 06:25 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft John Cowan (25 Nov 2012 18:53 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Per Bothner (25 Nov 2012 20:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS John Cowan (25 Nov 2012 21:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Sascha Ziemann (26 Nov 2012 13:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS Alex Shinn (26 Nov 2012 13:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 15:59 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner (25 Nov 2012 20:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 01:17 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner (26 Nov 2012 03:20 UTC)

Re: formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Arthur A. Gleckler (26 Nov 2012 05:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Per Bothner (27 Nov 2012 02:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic Alex Shinn (27 Nov 2012 04:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic John Cowan (27 Nov 2012 16:34 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 02:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make Mark H Weaver (26 Nov 2012 06:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 07:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make Mark H Weaver (26 Nov 2012 16:48 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] More editorial comments Alan Watson (26 Nov 2012 09:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments Alex Shinn (26 Nov 2012 13:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments John Cowan (27 Nov 2012 22:40 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot Mark H Weaver (26 Nov 2012 16:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 16:52 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence) John Cowan (26 Nov 2012 18:35 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence) Arthur A. Gleckler (28 Nov 2012 03:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Jean-Michel HUFFLEN (29 Nov 2012 23:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd] Alex Shinn (29 Nov 2012 23:35 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7 Steve Hafner (30 Nov 2012 19:03 UTC)

Re: Comments on R7RS, draft 7 Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Nov 2012 19:12 UTC)