|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Andy Wingo
(02 May 2011 10:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Alaric Snell-Pym
(02 May 2011 10:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Andy Wingo
(02 May 2011 10:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Alaric Snell-Pym
(02 May 2011 12:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling Aaron W. Hsu (02 May 2011 14:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Aaron W. Hsu
(02 May 2011 14:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(02 May 2011 15:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Aaron W. Hsu
(03 May 2011 00:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(03 May 2011 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(03 May 2011 01:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
John Cowan
(03 May 2011 07:04 UTC)
|
On Mon, 02 May 2011 08:32:39 -0400, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@snell-pym.org.uk> wrote: > As an aside, I've often wondered if it might be > desirable/possible/practical to offer an interface to introspect > continuations by extracting the chain of closures they might be > represented as / be isomorphic to, which is closely related to the > notion of "call chain" in stack-defined execution models. Which would be > far more generic than a Java-esque "backtraces exist inside exception > objects" system... I do not know about other Scheme implementations, but Chez Scheme provides such an inspector in both interactive and programmatic forms. Interesting, but definitely too scary to standardize. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports