|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Andy Wingo
(02 May 2011 10:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Alaric Snell-Pym
(02 May 2011 10:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Andy Wingo
(02 May 2011 10:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Alaric Snell-Pym
(02 May 2011 12:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Aaron W. Hsu
(02 May 2011 14:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling Aaron W. Hsu (02 May 2011 14:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(02 May 2011 15:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Aaron W. Hsu
(03 May 2011 00:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(03 May 2011 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
Vincent Manis
(03 May 2011 01:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
John Cowan
(03 May 2011 07:04 UTC)
|
On Mon, 02 May 2011 06:35:59 -0400, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@snell-pym.org.uk> wrote: > Same here. I wasn't suggesting standardising it, merely that for > implementations that have this concept, a way of providing it across > ERROR exceptions and more complex hierarchical exceptions would be nice. This was discussed extensively, and as yet, while we would all like something like this, we have not been able to find a way to do it that accurately reflects current practice well enough for widespread adoption. Aaron W. Hsu -- Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking. _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports