Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (05 Sep 2012 06:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (05 Sep 2012 08:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 04:34 UTC)
Re: Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 05:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 05:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Aaron W. Hsu (06 Sep 2012 12:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn 06 Sep 2012 04:34 UTC 
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>
>> As I had already explained to Christian off-list, cond-expand
>> is allowed at the top-level as the result of ticket #150.
>
> You're right, of course.
>
> Hmm.  I note that cond-expand, import, and include are all in the
> (scheme base) library, presumably because they are valid top-level
> program parts, whereas export is not, presumably because it isn't.
> Is that the Right Thing?  If so, why?

export would not even make sense outside a library definition context.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports