Re: Questions about cond-expand John Cowan 06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> > Hmm.  I note that cond-expand, import, and include are all in the
> > (scheme base) library, presumably because they are valid top-level
> > program parts, whereas export is not, presumably because it isn't.
> > Is that the Right Thing?  If so, why?
>
> export would not even make sense outside a library definition context.

Granted.  But cond-expand and import have to work even before
any library is imported, so what sense does it make to put them in
(scheme base)?

--
                Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.