Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
Andre van Tonder 05 Jul 2011 13:46 UTC
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Cowan wrote:
> It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.
Why is INCLUDE conflated with the module language? It is really an orthogonal
concept. INCLUDE as defined in Chez (e.g.) is just a form (definable as a
procedural macro) that can be used in any code, including R6RS libraries.
So we don't need the R7RS proposed syntax for INCLUDE.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
