Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library" John Cowan 05 Jul 2011 04:52 UTC

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> This just illustrates why choosing a syntax that is not backwards compatible
> with R6RS, yet is a feature subset of it is a bad idea. This issue wouldn't
> exist if we took the subset of features in R6RS that we currently use and use
> the R6RS syntax.

It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.

--
John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
Half the lies they tell about me are true.
        --Tallulah Bankhead, American actress

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports