|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(14 Nov 2012 08:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 09:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(14 Nov 2012 09:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 09:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(14 Nov 2012 10:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 21:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(14 Nov 2012 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 22:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 23:46 UTC)
|
|
[Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
(15 Nov 2012 00:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
Jim Rees
(15 Nov 2012 02:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
(15 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: equal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Nov 2012 20:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Aaron W. Hsu
(15 Nov 2012 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Shiro Kawai
(16 Nov 2012 01:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Per Bothner
(14 Nov 2012 21:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 21:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Andy Wingo (04 Jan 2013 13:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(04 Jan 2013 15:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alaric Snell-Pym
(04 Jan 2013 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(15 Nov 2012 07:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Per Bothner
(15 Nov 2012 16:17 UTC)
|
Hi Marc,
Reading old threads...
On Wed 14 Nov 2012 22:45, Marc Feeley <feeley@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> Let me say that I find it contrary to the spririt of Scheme to prevent redefinition and assignment of exported variables.
I love redefinitions, but I don't think invoking the "spirit of Scheme"
regarding `set!' is useful, especially in the light of Steele and
Sussman's remarks in "The First Report on Scheme Revisited",
http://cs.au.dk/~hosc/local/HOSC-11-4-pp399-404.pdf:
In retrospect, we can also see that some aspects of the initial
design of Scheme were flat-out wrong ... [We] believe that Carl
Hewitt was right: we would have been better off to have introduced
cells as a separate, primitive kind of object, rather than allowing
assignment to any and every λ-bound variable.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports