Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (05 Sep 2012 06:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (05 Sep 2012 08:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 04:34 UTC)
Re: Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 04:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Alex Shinn (06 Sep 2012 05:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan (06 Sep 2012 05:42 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand Aaron W. Hsu (06 Sep 2012 12:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand John Cowan 06 Sep 2012 04:28 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> As I had already explained to Christian off-list, cond-expand
> is allowed at the top-level as the result of ticket #150.

You're right, of course.

Hmm.  I note that cond-expand, import, and include are all in the
(scheme base) library, presumably because they are valid top-level
program parts, whereas export is not, presumably because it isn't.
Is that the Right Thing?  If so, why?

--
You're a brave man! Go and break through the            John Cowan
lines, and remember while you're out there              cowan@ccil.org
risking life and limb through shot and shell,           http://ccil.org/~cowan
we'll be in here thinking what a sucker you are!
        --Rufus T. Firefly

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports