|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(14 Nov 2012 08:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 09:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(14 Nov 2012 09:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 09:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL Helmut Eller (14 Nov 2012 10:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 21:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(14 Nov 2012 21:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 22:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alex Shinn
(14 Nov 2012 23:46 UTC)
|
|
[Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
(15 Nov 2012 00:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
Jim Rees
(15 Nov 2012 02:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
Alan Watson
(15 Nov 2012 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: equal?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(17 Nov 2012 20:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Aaron W. Hsu
(15 Nov 2012 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Shiro Kawai
(16 Nov 2012 01:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Per Bothner
(14 Nov 2012 21:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Marc Feeley
(14 Nov 2012 21:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Andy Wingo
(04 Jan 2013 13:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(04 Jan 2013 15:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Alaric Snell-Pym
(04 Jan 2013 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Helmut Eller
(15 Nov 2012 07:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
John Cowan
(15 Nov 2012 16:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Per Bothner
(15 Nov 2012 16:17 UTC)
|
On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Alex Shinn wrote: > Then why can you say that a REPL "should" support redefinition? > (Without defining what redefinition means.) > > This refers to redefining variables and syntax in general. > > For the specific case of redefining record types we could > add a note that existing instances may or may not be > mapped to the new type according to some unspecified > semantics, but I'm not sure if such a note adds anything. Just figured out that neither include nor load can be used to define/redefine libraries. So libraries are immutable and there is no portable way to "add" new libraries, right? Helmut _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
