|
[Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
(12 Apr 2012 02:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(12 Apr 2012 04:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Peter Bex
(12 Apr 2012 07:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Queiroz
(12 Apr 2012 07:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alaric Snell-Pym
(12 Apr 2012 09:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(12 Apr 2012 11:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alan Watson
(12 Apr 2012 13:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(12 Apr 2012 13:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Jeronimo Pellegrini
(12 Apr 2012 13:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson (12 Apr 2012 16:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Marc Feeley
(12 Apr 2012 13:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(15 Apr 2012 14:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(12 Apr 2012 13:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(14 Apr 2012 01:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(14 Apr 2012 02:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
Alex Shinn
(14 Apr 2012 03:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
John Cowan
(14 Apr 2012 03:08 UTC)
|
> This goes with the territory of any syntactic changes, > like the new symbol literals, bytevectors, and the > two (!) new types of comments. Difficult symbols and byte vectors were never portable between R5RS or earlier Schemes, so I don't worry that they are not portable between R7RS and R5RS Schemes. The write procedure does not write comments. Regards, Alan _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
