Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines | Simplelists

[Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson (12 Apr 2012 02:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan (12 Apr 2012 04:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Peter Bex (12 Apr 2012 07:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Queiroz (12 Apr 2012 07:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alaric Snell-Pym (12 Apr 2012 09:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn (12 Apr 2012 11:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson (12 Apr 2012 13:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn (12 Apr 2012 13:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Jeronimo Pellegrini (12 Apr 2012 13:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alan Watson (12 Apr 2012 16:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Marc Feeley (12 Apr 2012 13:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn (15 Apr 2012 14:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan (12 Apr 2012 13:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn (14 Apr 2012 01:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan (14 Apr 2012 02:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Shinn (14 Apr 2012 03:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines John Cowan (14 Apr 2012 03:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines Alex Queiroz 12 Apr 2012 07:51 UTC

Hallo,

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> I think this #true and #false is a completely gratuitous change, and if
> anyone has even the slightest problem with it, it should go.  It has
> almost zero benefit.
>

I believe so as well.

--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports