Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
Alex Shinn 05 Jul 2011 23:21 UTC
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Andre van Tonder <andre@het.brown.edu> wrote:
>
> Plus, traditional INCLUDE is nicely compositional. An INCLUDEd file can in turn
> INCLUDE otehr files, ad nauseam. On the other hand, WG1 module-level INCLUDE is
> not compositional. This is fine but, again, somewhat ugly IMO.
Good point.
--
Alex
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
