Group Email Manager

login signup

Date Index - May 2012 - Scheme Reports

07 May 2012 06:30 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
07 May 2012 12:28 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
07 May 2012 14:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan
07 May 2012 14:49 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
07 May 2012 14:51 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn
07 May 2012 14:59 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Stephen Leach
07 May 2012 15:13 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson
07 May 2012 17:09 UTC [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
07 May 2012 19:36 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
07 May 2012 21:32 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
07 May 2012 23:44 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
08 May 2012 00:43 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
08 May 2012 00:47 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alan Watson
08 May 2012 01:56 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
08 May 2012 03:23 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
08 May 2012 05:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver
08 May 2012 06:57 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
08 May 2012 07:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
08 May 2012 15:21 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Andrew Robbins
08 May 2012 19:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
08 May 2012 22:28 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Per Bothner
08 May 2012 22:45 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
08 May 2012 23:12 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn
08 May 2012 23:46 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Ray Dillinger
09 May 2012 04:00 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
09 May 2012 04:03 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
09 May 2012 07:45 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach
09 May 2012 17:09 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Aubrey Jaffer
10 May 2012 03:38 UTC [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
10 May 2012 05:23 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
10 May 2012 08:11 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Peter Bex
10 May 2012 16:56 UTC [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
10 May 2012 17:09 UTC Re: Date/time package Arthur A. Gleckler
10 May 2012 17:19 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
10 May 2012 18:54 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
10 May 2012 21:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
10 May 2012 21:58 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
10 May 2012 22:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alan Watson
10 May 2012 22:41 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Noah Lavine
10 May 2012 23:40 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
11 May 2012 02:16 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 02:43 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 02:48 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
11 May 2012 02:59 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve
11 May 2012 03:01 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 03:03 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 03:08 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn
11 May 2012 03:12 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 03:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Daniel Villeneuve
11 May 2012 04:05 UTC [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
11 May 2012 04:37 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
11 May 2012 04:37 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
11 May 2012 04:44 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 05:25 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
11 May 2012 10:05 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
11 May 2012 10:13 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex
11 May 2012 14:13 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 14:35 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
11 May 2012 14:47 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch
11 May 2012 15:18 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan
12 May 2012 02:53 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve
12 May 2012 05:07 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan
12 May 2012 22:10 UTC [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Aaron W. Hsu
12 May 2012 22:20 UTC Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Arthur A. Gleckler
12 May 2012 22:23 UTC Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete John Cowan
13 May 2012 18:46 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
13 May 2012 22:18 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan
14 May 2012 00:29 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger
14 May 2012 23:10 UTC [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example Daniel Villeneuve
15 May 2012 04:33 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example John Cowan
15 May 2012 17:03 UTC [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Trac Migration Complete John Cowan
17 May 2012 00:47 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan
17 May 2012 03:50 UTC [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
17 May 2012 18:18 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan
18 May 2012 00:19 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve
18 May 2012 00:40 UTC Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan