| 05 Jun 2012 15:07 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule |
Mike Morgan |
| 05 Jun 2012 23:13 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule |
Alex Shinn |
| 06 Jun 2012 15:00 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 06 Jun 2012 16:45 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Duncan Steele |
| 06 Jun 2012 18:50 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
John Cowan |
| 06 Jun 2012 19:16 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 06 Jun 2012 19:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 06 Jun 2012 21:38 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Duncan Steele |
| 06 Jun 2012 22:10 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 06 Jun 2012 23:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 02:34 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Mark H Weaver |
| 07 Jun 2012 03:03 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 07 Jun 2012 05:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 07 Jun 2012 09:26 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 07 Jun 2012 18:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 18:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:09 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:31 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:35 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:39 UTC |
Re: Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:44 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:45 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:56 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:57 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 07 Jun 2012 19:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Aaron W. Hsu |
| 07 Jun 2012 20:03 UTC |
Re: Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Arthur A. Gleckler |
| 07 Jun 2012 20:23 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 07 Jun 2012 20:23 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 08 Jun 2012 07:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alaric Snell-Pym |
| 08 Jun 2012 09:35 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Eli Barzilay |
| 08 Jun 2012 20:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 08 Jun 2012 23:33 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 10 Jun 2012 01:00 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Ray Dillinger |
| 10 Jun 2012 02:05 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 10 Jun 2012 02:23 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 10 Jun 2012 02:51 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Per Bothner |
| 10 Jun 2012 03:07 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 10 Jun 2012 03:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Ray Dillinger |
| 10 Jun 2012 04:02 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 10 Jun 2012 08:50 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 11 Jun 2012 04:00 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 11 Jun 2012 04:24 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 11 Jun 2012 05:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 11 Jun 2012 05:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 11 Jun 2012 05:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Per Bothner |
| 11 Jun 2012 16:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 11 Jun 2012 19:35 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Ray Dillinger |
| 11 Jun 2012 21:10 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 12 Jun 2012 10:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 12 Jun 2012 10:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Emmanuel Medernach |
| 12 Jun 2012 10:28 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 12 Jun 2012 11:43 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Per Bothner |
| 12 Jun 2012 15:13 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Mark H Weaver |
| 12 Jun 2012 19:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 12 Jun 2012 19:08 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
John Cowan |
| 12 Jun 2012 19:57 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Per Bothner |
| 13 Jun 2012 01:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft |
Alex Shinn |
| 13 Jun 2012 11:48 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations |
Göran Weinholt |
| 21 Jun 2012 23:26 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Reminder: public comment period on R7RS-small closes on June 30 |
John Cowan |
| 27 Jun 2012 12:09 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Wolfgang De Meuter |
| 27 Jun 2012 15:38 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Alex Shinn |
| 27 Jun 2012 16:54 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 27 Jun 2012 17:05 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Alex Shinn |
| 27 Jun 2012 18:44 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 27 Jun 2012 18:59 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Richard Kelsey |
| 27 Jun 2012 19:19 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 27 Jun 2012 19:30 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 27 Jun 2012 19:53 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
Richard Kelsey |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:05 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
Richard Kelsey |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
Per Bothner |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:35 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) |
Arthur Smyles |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:43 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? |
Richard Kelsey |
| 27 Jun 2012 20:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) |
Arthur Smyles |
| 27 Jun 2012 21:10 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
John Cowan |
| 27 Jun 2012 21:11 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 27 Jun 2012 21:14 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Alex Shinn |
| 27 Jun 2012 21:56 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Aubrey Jaffer |
| 27 Jun 2012 22:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Alex Shinn |
| 28 Jun 2012 02:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 28 Jun 2012 03:59 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec* |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:07 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:17 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) |
Andrew Robbins |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:52 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 04:55 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 05:04 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 05:06 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 05:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures? |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 05:37 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base) |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 06:30 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Wolfgang De Meuter |
| 28 Jun 2012 07:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 28 Jun 2012 08:12 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 28 Jun 2012 08:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 28 Jun 2012 08:40 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 28 Jun 2012 09:48 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 28 Jun 2012 09:51 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports |
Alex Shinn |
| 28 Jun 2012 11:39 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case |
Richard Kelsey |
| 28 Jun 2012 12:07 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Richard Kelsey |
| 28 Jun 2012 14:56 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Richard Kelsey |
| 28 Jun 2012 21:21 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 21:56 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 22:00 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
John Cowan |
| 28 Jun 2012 23:22 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Richard Kelsey |
| 28 Jun 2012 23:27 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Richard Kelsey |
| 29 Jun 2012 16:34 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 29 Jun 2012 16:58 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS |
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN |
| 29 Jun 2012 17:03 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules |
Richard Kelsey |
| 29 Jun 2012 17:08 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception |
Richard Kelsey |
| 29 Jun 2012 17:09 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 29 Jun 2012 17:15 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 29 Jun 2012 17:31 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes |
Richard Kelsey |
| 29 Jun 2012 18:00 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS |
Jussi Piitulainen |
| 29 Jun 2012 18:25 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Alex Shinn |
| 29 Jun 2012 19:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS |
John Cowan |
| 29 Jun 2012 19:39 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Richard Kelsey |
| 29 Jun 2012 20:29 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Alex Shinn |
| 29 Jun 2012 20:32 UTC |
[Scheme-reports] Reminder: R7RS public comment period |
William D Clinger |
| 30 Jun 2012 00:53 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Alex Shinn |
| 30 Jun 2012 01:20 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'? |
Eli Barzilay |
| 30 Jun 2012 18:34 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Richard Kelsey |
| 30 Jun 2012 20:58 UTC |
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features |
Alex Shinn |
