Thread Index - June 2013 - Scheme Reports

[scheme-reports-wg1] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan (01 Jun 2013 15:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance taylanbayirli@gmail.com (01 Jun 2013 16:38 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance John Cowan (01 Jun 2013 17:14 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (02 Jun 2013 04:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Peter Bex (02 Jun 2013 10:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (02 Jun 2013 12:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (02 Jun 2013 13:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (03 Jun 2013 03:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger (03 Jun 2013 17:04 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (04 Jun 2013 15:55 UTC)

Re: Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Jun 2013 16:46 UTC)

Re: Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Jun 2013 17:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (04 Jun 2013 19:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (04 Jun 2013 23:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 00:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (05 Jun 2013 00:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (05 Jun 2013 00:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson (05 Jun 2013 01:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (05 Jun 2013 01:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson (05 Jun 2013 01:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (05 Jun 2013 01:21 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alan Watson (05 Jun 2013 01:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 01:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (05 Jun 2013 01:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Shiro Kawai (05 Jun 2013 11:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 12:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (05 Jun 2013 13:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger (05 Jun 2013 15:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate William D Clinger (05 Jun 2013 15:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 16:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (04 Jun 2013 18:06 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4 Gerald Jay Sussman (04 Jun 2013 22:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner (04 Jun 2013 23:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Noah Lavine (05 Jun 2013 04:24 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Per Bothner (05 Jun 2013 06:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity taylanbayirli@gmail.com (05 Jun 2013 10:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym (05 Jun 2013 11:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Andy Wingo (07 Jun 2013 21:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Alaric Snell-Pym (07 Jun 2013 22:17 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan (08 Jun 2013 03:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity Kevin Millikin (09 Jun 2013 07:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity taylanbayirli@gmail.com (05 Jun 2013 11:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 12:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity taylanbayirli@gmail.com (05 Jun 2013 14:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedure equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (05 Jun 2013 14:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (05 Jun 2013 18:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (06 Jun 2013 05:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (06 Jun 2013 09:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Ray Dillinger (06 Jun 2013 17:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (05 Jun 2013 22:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 00:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (06 Jun 2013 05:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alex Shinn (06 Jun 2013 12:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (06 Jun 2013 12:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (06 Jun 2013 16:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 14:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (06 Jun 2013 14:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 14:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 14:24 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 14:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate will@ccs.neu.edu (06 Jun 2013 15:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate xacc.ide@gmail.com (06 Jun 2013 17:40 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve (08 Jun 2013 03:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan (08 Jun 2013 03:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Takashi Kato (08 Jun 2013 04:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn (08 Jun 2013 22:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) John Cowan (08 Jun 2013 23:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Alex Shinn (09 Jun 2013 00:27 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Andy Wingo (09 Jun 2013 09:29 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9) Daniel Villeneuve (08 Jun 2013 16:25 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn (09 Jun 2013 01:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alexey Radul (09 Jun 2013 03:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan (09 Jun 2013 04:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures taylanbayirli@gmail.com (09 Jun 2013 12:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures John Cowan (09 Jun 2013 14:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures Alex Shinn (13 Jun 2013 00:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (09 Jun 2013 04:10 UTC)

Re: Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Jun 2013 05:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (09 Jun 2013 05:48 UTC)

Re: Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Jun 2013 06:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Alexey Radul (09 Jun 2013 14:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Andy Wingo (09 Jun 2013 09:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate John Cowan (09 Jun 2013 14:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (09 Jun 2013 14:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (09 Jun 2013 12:49 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Christian Stigen Larsen (09 Jun 2013 20:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility Alex Shinn (10 Jun 2013 00:06 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility William D Clinger (09 Jun 2013 21:57 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals John Cowan (10 Jun 2013 05:03 UTC)