Thread Index - December 2013 - Scheme Reports

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition Alex Shinn (01 Dec 2013 03:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition John Cowan (01 Dec 2013 05:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition Alex Shinn (01 Dec 2013 07:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition Jussi Piitulainen (01 Dec 2013 14:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition John Cowan (01 Dec 2013 22:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition John Cowan (02 Dec 2013 00:28 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? Yuichi Nishiwaki (01 Dec 2013 09:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? Alex Shinn (01 Dec 2013 12:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? Yuichi Nishiwaki (01 Dec 2013 15:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? Alex Shinn (01 Dec 2013 17:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? John Cowan (01 Dec 2013 20:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? Yuichi Nishiwaki (02 Dec 2013 13:44 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg2] New versions of SRFI 113 and 114 John Cowan (04 Dec 2013 04:27 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3? Yuichi Nishiwaki (10 Dec 2013 19:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3? John Cowan (10 Dec 2013 21:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3? Yuichi Nishiwaki (10 Dec 2013 23:31 UTC)