Thread Index - August 2012 - Scheme Reports

[scheme-reports-wg1] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments John Cowan (03 Aug 2012 20:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this Mark H Weaver (07 Aug 2012 20:12 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) Mark H Weaver (08 Aug 2012 11:45 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates) Alex Shinn (08 Aug 2012 11:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine (09 Aug 2012 02:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Emmanuel Medernach (09 Aug 2012 07:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine (09 Aug 2012 21:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Ray Dillinger (12 Aug 2012 03:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Noah Lavine (12 Aug 2012 12:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@googlegroups.com - 13 Messages in 5 Topics Mark H Weaver (12 Aug 2012 16:03 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Ray Dillinger (13 Aug 2012 19:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. John Cowan (13 Aug 2012 21:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Ray Dillinger (14 Aug 2012 02:31 UTC)

Re: eq? considered harmful. Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Aug 2012 02:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful. Mark H Weaver (14 Aug 2012 05:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations Mark H Weaver (13 Aug 2012 18:01 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo (19 Aug 2012 09:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Peter Bex (19 Aug 2012 09:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo (20 Aug 2012 07:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alex Shinn (20 Aug 2012 08:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo (22 Aug 2012 06:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? xacc.ide@gmail.com (23 Aug 2012 14:12 UTC)

Re: valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Aug 2012 19:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? John Cowan (21 Aug 2012 20:24 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alaric Snell-Pym (20 Aug 2012 10:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo (20 Aug 2012 13:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Alaric Snell-Pym (20 Aug 2012 14:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Andy Wingo (20 Aug 2012 15:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Aaron W. Hsu (21 Aug 2012 16:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file? Peter Bex (21 Aug 2012 18:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc Andy Wingo (19 Aug 2012 09:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv? Vassil Nikolov (25 Aug 2012 01:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero John Cowan (26 Aug 2012 15:42 UTC)

Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan (29 Aug 2012 22:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" David A. Wheeler (30 Aug 2012 03:01 UTC)

Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan (30 Aug 2012 06:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" David A. Wheeler (30 Aug 2012 12:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Ray Dillinger (30 Aug 2012 19:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Boyle (31 Aug 2012 08:31 UTC)

Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan (31 Aug 2012 15:22 UTC)

Re: Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" John Cowan (31 Aug 2012 21:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Pierpaolo Bernardi (31 Aug 2012 12:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?" Per Bothner (30 Aug 2012 17:08 UTC)