Thread Index - May 2012 - Scheme Reports

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan (07 May 2012 06:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson (07 May 2012 12:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" John Cowan (07 May 2012 14:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson (07 May 2012 14:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alex Shinn (07 May 2012 14:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Stephen Leach (07 May 2012 14:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*" Alan Watson (07 May 2012 15:13 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver (07 May 2012 17:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach (07 May 2012 19:36 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (07 May 2012 21:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver (07 May 2012 23:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn (08 May 2012 00:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alan Watson (08 May 2012 00:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver (08 May 2012 01:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn (08 May 2012 03:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Mark H Weaver (08 May 2012 05:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn (08 May 2012 22:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Alex Shinn (08 May 2012 23:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (17 May 2012 00:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (08 May 2012 06:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (08 May 2012 07:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Andrew Robbins (08 May 2012 15:21 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (08 May 2012 19:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Per Bothner (08 May 2012 22:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Ray Dillinger (08 May 2012 23:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (09 May 2012 04:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Aubrey Jaffer (09 May 2012 17:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence Emmanuel Medernach (09 May 2012 07:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence John Cowan (09 May 2012 04:00 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve (10 May 2012 03:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan (10 May 2012 05:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Daniel Villeneuve (11 May 2012 02:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Peter Bex (10 May 2012 08:11 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (10 May 2012 16:56 UTC)

Re: Date/time package Arthur A. Gleckler (10 May 2012 17:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (10 May 2012 17:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex (10 May 2012 18:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (10 May 2012 21:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex (10 May 2012 21:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alan Watson (10 May 2012 22:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Noah Lavine (10 May 2012 22:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 02:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 02:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn (11 May 2012 02:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 03:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Alex Shinn (11 May 2012 03:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 03:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex (11 May 2012 10:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Peter Bex (11 May 2012 10:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 14:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch (10 May 2012 23:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 03:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch (11 May 2012 04:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 04:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch (11 May 2012 05:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 14:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John J Foerch (11 May 2012 14:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package John Cowan (11 May 2012 15:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package Daniel Villeneuve (11 May 2012 03:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger (13 May 2012 18:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers John Cowan (13 May 2012 22:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers Ray Dillinger (14 May 2012 00:29 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve (11 May 2012 04:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan (11 May 2012 04:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions Daniel Villeneuve (12 May 2012 02:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions John Cowan (12 May 2012 05:07 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Aaron W. Hsu (12 May 2012 22:10 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete Arthur A. Gleckler (12 May 2012 22:20 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete John Cowan (12 May 2012 22:23 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Trac Migration Complete John Cowan (15 May 2012 17:03 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example Daniel Villeneuve (14 May 2012 23:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example John Cowan (15 May 2012 04:33 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve (17 May 2012 03:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan (17 May 2012 18:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless Daniel Villeneuve (18 May 2012 00:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless John Cowan (18 May 2012 00:40 UTC)