Thread Index - August 2011 - Scheme Reports

[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Denis Washington (01 Aug 2011 18:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Alex Shinn (03 Aug 2011 06:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Denis Washington (03 Aug 2011 07:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 16:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Alex Queiroz (03 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 18:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 21:10 UTC)

Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Aug 2011 21:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Aaron W. Hsu (03 Aug 2011 22:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 John Cowan (06 Aug 2011 20:04 UTC)

Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Aug 2011 16:36 UTC)

Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Aug 2011 22:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Raffael Cavallaro (03 Aug 2011 19:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 05:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Denis Washington (07 Aug 2011 09:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 17:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2) Alex Shinn (03 Aug 2011 06:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? Jonáš Vidra (03 Aug 2011 06:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? leppie (03 Aug 2011 06:44 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] (command-line) needs to specify argv[0] behavior Per Bothner (03 Aug 2011 18:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] (command-line) needs to specify argv[0] behavior John Cowan (04 Aug 2011 21:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Denis Washington (03 Aug 2011 18:40 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] current-XXX-port is binary? Per Bothner (03 Aug 2011 19:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Denis Washington (03 Aug 2011 21:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 22:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 03:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (04 Aug 2011 04:06 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 04:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 05:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (04 Aug 2011 21:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 23:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Andre van Tonder (06 Aug 2011 10:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (05 Aug 2011 05:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing" Andy Wingo (04 Aug 2011 09:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing" Alex Shinn (04 Aug 2011 09:24 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3 Sven Hartrumpf (04 Aug 2011 18:30 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3 John Cowan (06 Aug 2011 20:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3 John Cowan (08 Aug 2011 23:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3 Andy Wingo (07 Aug 2011 08:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2) John Cowan (06 Aug 2011 18:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (06 Aug 2011 21:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC)

Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6 Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Aug 2011 22:36 UTC)

Re: Dividing Section 6.3 Arthur A. Gleckler (06 Aug 2011 23:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 Malcolm Tredinnick (07 Aug 2011 01:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 John Cowan (07 Aug 2011 01:45 UTC)

Re: Dividing Section 6.3 Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Aug 2011 01:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3 Ray Dillinger (07 Aug 2011 15:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Alex Shinn (07 Aug 2011 22:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Denis Washington (08 Aug 2011 11:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 20:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 20:59 UTC)

Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Eli Barzilay (12 Aug 2011 21:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (12 Aug 2011 21:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Ray Dillinger (13 Aug 2011 15:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution John Cowan (12 Aug 2011 22:29 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (13 Aug 2011 12:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Aubrey Jaffer (13 Aug 2011 17:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Shiro Kawai (14 Aug 2011 04:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andre van Tonder (13 Aug 2011 15:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andy Wingo (14 Aug 2011 20:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Andre van Tonder (14 Aug 2011 21:48 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] exception handling Per Bothner (08 Aug 2011 19:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan (08 Aug 2011 19:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling Per Bothner (08 Aug 2011 21:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan (08 Aug 2011 23:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 19:23 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Rational? and real? predicates Peter Bex (09 Aug 2011 18:35 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Peter Bex (10 Aug 2011 19:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 16:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Vincent St-Amour (16 Aug 2011 18:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 20:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 21:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Per Bothner (16 Aug 2011 21:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (17 Aug 2011 19:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Vincent St-Amour (17 Aug 2011 19:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Vincent St-Amour (18 Aug 2011 20:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 21:16 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Ray Dillinger (17 Aug 2011 16:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (17 Aug 2011 18:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (10 Aug 2011 19:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax Jussi Piitulainen (15 Aug 2011 07:31 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 23:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution Aubrey Jaffer (12 Aug 2011 21:10 UTC)

Re: "include" filename resolution Arthur A. Gleckler (12 Aug 2011 21:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution John Cowan (12 Aug 2011 22:27 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Jussi Piitulainen (15 Aug 2011 07:46 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (15 Aug 2011 19:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 18:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Andre van Tonder (16 Aug 2011 20:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 20:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer (18 Aug 2011 16:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (15 Aug 2011 21:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Andre van Tonder (15 Aug 2011 08:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Peter Bex (15 Aug 2011 09:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (15 Aug 2011 15:26 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Formal syntax versus text Jussi Piitulainen (15 Aug 2011 08:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Andy Wingo (15 Aug 2011 21:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Alex Shinn (16 Aug 2011 16:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 17:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Eli Barzilay (16 Aug 2011 18:10 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Andre van Tonder (16 Aug 2011 18:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft John Cowan (19 Aug 2011 20:25 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft Andy Wingo (16 Aug 2011 20:22 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? Alex Queiroz (16 Aug 2011 09:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 10:29 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Alex Queiroz (16 Aug 2011 11:44 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Andy Wingo (16 Aug 2011 13:27 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Grant Rettke (16 Aug 2011 14:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 14:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors? Alex Shinn (16 Aug 2011 15:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax Alex Shinn (19 Aug 2011 16:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax John Cowan (19 Aug 2011 20:30 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Poll: intentions concerning the R7RS "small" language Alex Shinn (21 Aug 2011 12:11 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Alex Shinn (23 Aug 2011 02:31 UTC)

Re: practical matters - CSAN Arthur A. Gleckler (23 Aug 2011 02:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN John Cowan (23 Aug 2011 04:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Andy Wingo (23 Aug 2011 07:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (23 Aug 2011 21:55 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Aubrey Jaffer (29 Aug 2011 16:19 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN John Cowan (29 Aug 2011 16:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Andy Wingo (29 Aug 2011 17:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN Alex Shinn (24 Aug 2011 01:58 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] John Cowan's rationales for 4th ballot votes Denis Washington (23 Aug 2011 06:26 UTC)

[Scheme-reports] Complex numbers with infinities and NaN Peter Bex (24 Aug 2011 18:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Complex numbers with infinities and NaN John Cowan (24 Aug 2011 20:59 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Division by zero Alex Shinn (24 Aug 2011 23:07 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)" Aaron W. Hsu (29 Aug 2011 18:21 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)" John Cowan (29 Aug 2011 18:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)" Andre van Tonder (29 Aug 2011 20:18 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)" Alex Shinn (29 Aug 2011 22:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)" Andre van Tonder (29 Aug 2011 20:16 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington (30 Aug 2011 08:20 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Aug 2011 22:44 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2011 00:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Alex Shinn (31 Aug 2011 00:18 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Alex Shinn (31 Aug 2011 02:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington (31 Aug 2011 06:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington (31 Aug 2011 07:11 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2011 07:15 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Alex Shinn (31 Aug 2011 07:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington (31 Aug 2011 07:53 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Denis Washington (31 Aug 2011 06:56 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Andre van Tonder (31 Aug 2011 15:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Alaric Snell-Pym (31 Aug 2011 15:33 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Aug 2011 17:24 UTC)