Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn (24 Dec 2010 00:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:27 UTC)
[Scheme-reports] Scheme is NOT spam! Vincent Manis (24 Dec 2010 02:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn 24 Dec 2010 00:21 UTC 
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Andre van Tonder <andre@het.brown.edu> wrote:
>
> After years of using Scheme, I have probably encountered LOOP less than 5 times
> in someone else's code.  Every time I had to go look it up in the standard to
> try to figure out what it means.  In my opinion, LOOP code is not readable code.

I don't think anyone has any intention of proposing
the CL loop.  More likely would be Shiver's loop or
foof-loop (http://mumble.net/~campbell/scheme/foof-loop.txt).

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports