I see that the report decided that the `_', `else', `...', etc auxiliary
syntaxes are to be bound in (scheme base).  That's probably a good
thing.  Good job.  I guess they'd be bound like:

  (define-syntax else (syntax-rules ())

Does that definition need to go in the report, along with the definition
of `cond' et al?

I do suspect that people that aren't used to bound auxiliary syntax will
find it a bit odd.

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports