|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 13:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(23 Jan 2012 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 15:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(23 Jan 2012 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(23 Jan 2012 20:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(23 Jan 2012 23:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Vincent Manis
(24 Jan 2012 01:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 02:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 Jan 2012 09:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 15:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings xacc.ide@gmail.com (24 Jan 2012 16:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2012 17:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(24 Jan 2012 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Jan 2012 02:16 UTC)
|
> I was quite surprised by how many implementations take the trouble to > return true. What trouble? The underlying framework of my scheme does that for me :) I suspect the Java ones to be the same (due to string interning). One problem though is making sure (let ((a "foo")) (eq? a (string-copy a))) returns false. Cheers leppie _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
