Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module

Show/hide message thread

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 07:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 16:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 16:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 19:48 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 19:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (21 May 2011 06:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (21 May 2011 08:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 17:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:05 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (24 May 2011 07:06 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 16:08 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Emmanuel Medernach (24 May 2011 17:06 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (24 May 2011 18:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Per Bothner (24 May 2011 23:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 21:20 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (24 May 2011 21:26 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (24 May 2011 21:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (24 May 2011 21:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (25 May 2011 03:41 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (25 May 2011 06:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (21 May 2011 08:42 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 16:27 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Alex Shinn (20 May 2011 16:54 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 16:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (20 May 2011 17:47 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (20 May 2011 20:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (21 May 2011 02:03 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 05:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Eli Barzilay (21 May 2011 05:04 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 18:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Andre van Tonder (21 May 2011 19:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module John Cowan (21 May 2011 20:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module Alex Shinn 20 May 2011 16:53 UTC

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> wrote:
>
> I can't help but feel that the above implementation is woefully broken. Is
> it conformant? Maybe you could make an argument for that, since the
> standards (R5RS and R6RS) don't say anything about what happens when
> (list? (values 1 2)) is evaluated. On the other hand, I hardly think that
> we should be looking to this as a good example of anything. A tiny
> implementation like Chibi could still be compliant without this mess (and
> I do think it is a mess). It could still be *easily* compliant without
> this mess. It's one thing to take liberties from the intentioned norms for
> good reasons, but I fail to see good reasons for doing the above.

Easily?  Without adding more than 10 lines or so of C?
Patches welcome! :)

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports