> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
> restrictions like memory) exact integers?

No

> 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers?

Yes

> 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers?

Yes

> 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers?

Yes

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Alan Watson <alan@alan-watson.org> wrote:
>> 1) Should R7RS-large require arbitrarily large (up to implementation
>> restrictions like memory) exact integers?
>
> Yes.
>
>> 2) Should R7RS-large require support for exact rational numbers?
>
> Abstention.
>
>> 3) Should R7RS-large require support for exact complex numbers?
>
> Abstention.
>
>> 4) Should R7RS-large require inexact complex numbers?
>
> Yes.
> --
> Dr. Alan M. Watson
> Instituto de Astronomía
> Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

--
====
Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. No.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports