Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan (22 Dec 2012 02:43 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0 John Cowan 22 Dec 2012 02:42 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Yes, the intention is to catch overflow as well, though infinity is a
> useful numerical concept and I have no intention to remove those values.

In that case, what is the reciprocal of negative infinity?

> I think any slow-down is better than giving the wrong answer,

That's what exact arithmetic is for.

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan
And now here I was, in a country where a right to say how the country should
be governed was restricted to six persons in each thousand of its population.
For the nine hundred and ninety-four to express dissatisfaction with the
regnant system and propose to change it, would have made the whole six
shudder as one man, it would have been so disloyal, so dishonorable, such
putrid black treason.  --Mark Twain's Connecticut Yankee

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports