Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer scripsit:

> Should `set-queue-from-list!' and `set-queue-from-first-last!' not be
> called `set-queue-list!' and `set-queue-first-last!'?

Changed to `queue-set-list!` and `queue-set-first-last!`.

> I'm not sure when `queue-concatenate' should be used in code that
> wants to be portable.  If no limit is defined for the length of the
> argument list of `apply', then I can only do guesswork.

In my test suite of Schemes, the most limited is RScheme with a limit
of 998 arguments.  See <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ApplyArgsLimit>
for details.

> And the whole thing seems like a huge kludge; can implementations
> with such a limit not solve the issue in a way other than to burden
> not only the programmer but even the whole standard?

I'm tracking `list-concatenate` from SRFI 1, `string-concatenate` from
SRFI 13, and `vector-concatenate` from SRFI 43.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Economists were put on this planet to make astrologers look good.
        --Leo McGarry

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.