Re: [Scheme-reports] <literal> was used in two sense
John Cowan 16 Jul 2014 03:51 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> I generally refer to both as just literals, and they're not part of
> the same BNF, but I have no objection to <pattern literal>.
Errata list updated.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports