Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form John Cowan (01 May 2011 21:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form John Cowan 01 May 2011 21:35 UTC

Vincent Manis scripsit:

> I don't understand this. Polar and rectangular are external
> representations, are they not?  Does a Scheme implementation have to
> flag complex numbers by their representation? What happens when you
> mix the two kinds of numbers?

None of Racket, Gauche, MIT, Gambit, Chicken with the numbers egg,
Bigloo, Guile, Kawa, Scheme48, SISC, Chibi, Chez, SCM, Ikarus,
Larceny, Ypsilon, Mosh, STklos, SSCM, and Scheme 9 distinguish between
rectangular and polar complex numbers.

--
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
[R]eversing the apostolic precept to be all things to all men, I usually [before
Darwin] defended the tenability of the received doctrines, when I had to do
with the [evolution]ists; and stood up for the possibility of [evolution] among
the orthodox --thereby, no doubt, increasing an already current, but quite
undeserved, reputation for needless combativeness.  --T. H. Huxley

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports