[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (19 May 2011 17:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 03:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 09:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andre van Tonder (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (21 May 2011 22:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (23 May 2011 22:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz 20 May 2011 09:04 UTC

Hallo,

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I am mildly in favor, though the concision of "blob-length" over
> "bytevector-length" is a point in blob's favor.
>

     True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
not BLOB.

Cheers,
--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports