Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
leppie 22 Mar 2012 11:02 UTC
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could use the sequence (a c d b) i.e. evaluate the test of the cond
> clause in the dynamic environment of raise and unwind the stack only
> when the test returns true. That's arguably "better" as this will call
> other handlers in the correct environment if the test returns #f.
While it seems intuitive, I prefer the behavior as described by Aaron
for full continuations.
The only difference being in IronScheme, that cannot re-raise in the
original caller's extent.
I would also like to point out the behavior (at least for R6RS) when
the clause returns #t, the result is (a b c d).
This is the same for full continuations or just using escape
continuations as in IronScheme.
Cheers
leppie
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports