quad writes:

> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> > May I point out that this last one is now a non-argument. "@" was
> > already freed and can be used in symbols and identifiers.
>
> Perhaps it is a mistake, but the "@" syntax is in the formal grammar
> for complex numbers in the R7RS draft.
>
> Or perhaps you mean you're still able to use "@" despite it being
> specified for complex number construction.

Of course I mean the latter.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports