On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Jussi Piitulainen
<jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> Do all these need to remain in the language? In (scheme base)?

We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but
I definitely think everything but the one and two depth
combinations should be removed from (scheme base).
Their use is generally a code smell.  People should
use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports