Group Email Manager

login signup
Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn (23 Dec 2010 23:39 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn (24 Dec 2010 00:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:27 UTC)
[Scheme-reports] Scheme is NOT spam! Vincent Manis (24 Dec 2010 02:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn 23 Dec 2010 23:36 UTC 
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
>
> Insanity. If it will be a portable library that places no burden on
> implementors, then it doesn't even need to be in the standard.

This is for WG2, the "large" standard.  The whole point of WG2
is to provide standard libraries.  If you don't think libraries matter,
free to ignore the WG2 effort and only concern yourself with WG1.

> How do you think it will genuinely place no burden on implementors?

Because they can just use the reference implementation.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports