Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers John Cowan (20 May 2011 01:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers John Cowan (20 May 2011 21:12 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers John Cowan 20 May 2011 21:12 UTC

Andy Wingo scripsit:

> This is for printing values, not for representing values.  You would
> use it as part of an floating-point printing routine.

Ah, sorry: I misread number->string as string->number.

> Guile will probably implement multi-precision floats within the next
> year or two.  As you probably saw GCC just added a dependency on mpfr,
> so as to get compile-time constant folding done right.  I wouldn't
> count multi-precision floats out yet.

Well, perhaps it's good that we left the exponent markers in, then.

--
Verbogeny is one of the pleasurettes    John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
of a creatific thinkerizer.             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
   --Peter da Silva

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports