Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? John Cowan (03 Jan 2012 04:02 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name? John Cowan 03 Jan 2012 04:01 UTC

Stefan Edwards scripsit:

> What about loading alternative implementation of a feature, such as
> falling back onto the reference implementation of a SRFI if the Scheme
> you're using doesn't provide one? I actually think this would ease
> writing libraries likes SLIB or Nausicaa that support multiple Scheme
> implementations and have to Spackle the gaps in features between them.

If possible that should be done using cond-expand in the module
language.

--
John Cowan  http://ccil.org/~cowan    cowan@ccil.org
There are books that are at once excellent and boring.  Those that at
once leap to the mind are Thoreau's Walden, Emerson's Essays, George
Eliot's Adam Bede, and Landor's Dialogues.  --Somerset Maugham

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports