On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 11:43 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> I have two problems with it.  One is that very few Schemers have used
> it.  I asked on this list once who had used it, and no one replied in
> the affirmative.  Therefore it is not "core" enough to go into a
> "small" r7rs.

I must object to this. Firstly, I use raise-continuable all the time in
various things that I do, and most of the exception systems that I have
seen in Scheme have some equivalent form to this form. Moreover, the
distinction between raise and raise-continuable is one that I have found
useful in practice.

--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcfide@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us
לֵ֤ב חֲכָמִים֙ בְּבֵ֣ית אֵ֔בֶל וְלֵ֥ב כְּסִילִ֖ים בְּבֵ֥ית שִׂמְחָֽה׃

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports