On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:02 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>
>> Sure, you can change your mind about what you think is good for WG2,
>> but you can't retroactively change the vote.  Pending a proper WG2
>> vote, the WG1 members must act under the assumption that WG2 will have
>> R6RS-style blobs only.
>
> Actually it's the other way around:  what WG2 voted for was "homogenous
> numeric arrays", without specifying how they would be implemented.
> See http://tinyurl.com/wg2-ballot.

Exactly, the WG2 votes were simply for broad topics.
The WG1 vote was for a very specific proposal and
would take precedence.

But we're free to change our minds in WG2.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports