Group Email Manager

login signup
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (19 May 2011 17:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 03:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 09:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andre van Tonder (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz (20 May 2011 14:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (21 May 2011 22:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Andy Wingo (22 May 2011 14:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (22 May 2011 17:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Aaron W. Hsu (23 May 2011 22:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs John Cowan (23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs Alex Queiroz 20 May 2011 14:30 UTC 
Hallo,

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Andre van Tonder <andre@het.brown.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Alex Queiroz wrote:
>
>>    True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
>> Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
>> not BLOB.
>
> What about CONS, CAR, or CDR?
>

     Historical reasons? Does anyone think they are good names? (ok,
they compose well, but...)

--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports