On 08/02/2011 06:20 PM, Denis Washington wrote:

> While reviewing the current draft, I started to wonder: now that many
> things have been already voted on and the changes introduced in the
> coming draft(s) won't be that big anymore (I guess?), it would be time
> to slowly find out how the resonance of the implementations' authors is
> with regard to supporting the standard, especially the module/library
> system. However, it doesn't seem as if there were any feedback from
> implementors yet.

Oh, we've had the esteemed Andy Wingo (Rep. Guile) commenting - but it
would be good to have some more.

I'd hope that the implementers would keep an ear open for R7RS, but if
they don't, then we should indeed try and seek them...

...any volunteers to find contact details for all the active ones? :-)

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports