[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible John Cowan 24 Nov 2012 19:17 UTC

This Formal Comment was rejected by a vote of the WG, which instead
adopted the following procedures:

        `write-simple` (traditional `write`)
        `write` (with datum labels only to break cycles)
        `write-shared` (datum labels to show all shared structure, the
                `write-with-shared-structure` of SRFI-38)

--
They tried to pierce your heart                 John Cowan
with a Morgul-knife that remains in the         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
wound.  If they had succeeded, you would
become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord.         --Gandalf

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports