[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible
John Cowan 24 Nov 2012 19:17 UTC
This Formal Comment was rejected by a vote of the WG, which instead
adopted the following procedures:
`write-simple` (traditional `write`)
`write` (with datum labels only to break cycles)
`write-shared` (datum labels to show all shared structure, the
`write-with-shared-structure` of SRFI-38)
--
They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan
with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
wound. If they had succeeded, you would
become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord. --Gandalf
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports