Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Andy Wingo (07 May 2014 19:38 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (07 May 2014 23:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Andy Wingo (14 May 2014 20:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Arthur A. Gleckler (14 May 2014 20:56 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Per Bothner (14 May 2014 23:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (15 May 2014 03:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Per Bothner (15 May 2014 07:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (15 May 2014 13:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Per Bothner (15 May 2014 22:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (15 May 2014 10:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (15 May 2014 12:20 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Sascha Ziemann (16 May 2014 08:37 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (16 May 2014 08:46 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (16 May 2014 08:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (16 May 2014 21:05 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (16 May 2014 20:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot xacc.ide@gmail.com (16 May 2014 20:41 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan 07 May 2014 23:06 UTC

Andy Wingo scripsit:

<flame>
> This discussion is frankly ridiculous.  Where are Dybvig, Flatt, Clinger
> et al?  Where is Feeley?

Where is Wingo?

> While I'm at it, where *is* the R7RS small final edition?

It is at <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/r7rs.pdf>,
on the only site where WG members can post anything.

> Why is it not on R7RS.org?

Complain to Christian Stigen Larsen.  If you want to know why it isn't
on scheme-reports.org, complain to the Steering Committee (viz. Clinger,
Feeley, Hanson, Rees, Shivers), and the best of luck to you -- I hope
you can get them to act.

> That this discussion of differences and requirements is happening *for
> the large version* is just... I don't know.  I don't even know what to
> say.  Good luck I guess but count me out.

So because you don't find your peers here, you're walking out instead of
helping?  Talk about class snobbery!  How about pitching in instead?
The implementer's viewpoint is greatly valued here -- when we can get it.
</flame>

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.