[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
John Cowan 07 May 2014 23:06 UTC
Andy Wingo scripsit:
<flame>
> This discussion is frankly ridiculous. Where are Dybvig, Flatt, Clinger
> et al? Where is Feeley?
Where is Wingo?
> While I'm at it, where *is* the R7RS small final edition?
It is at <http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/r7rs.pdf>,
on the only site where WG members can post anything.
> Why is it not on R7RS.org?
Complain to Christian Stigen Larsen. If you want to know why it isn't
on scheme-reports.org, complain to the Steering Committee (viz. Clinger,
Feeley, Hanson, Rees, Shivers), and the best of luck to you -- I hope
you can get them to act.
> That this discussion of differences and requirements is happening *for
> the large version* is just... I don't know. I don't even know what to
> say. Good luck I guess but count me out.
So because you don't find your peers here, you're walking out instead of
helping? Talk about class snobbery! How about pitching in instead?
The implementer's viewpoint is greatly valued here -- when we can get it.
</flame>
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.