Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
John Cowan 24 Dec 2010 03:21 UTC
Andre van Tonder scripsit:
>> It definitely will, probably either Taylor Campbell's or Olin Shivers's.
>> No :-) at all.
>
> Why?
Because WG2 so voted. All of you had ample opportunity to join it,
but for whatever reason you couldn't or didn't, so you don't get a
vote at this point.
(If anyone wants to join now, let me know. We could use warm blood.)
> have not even gone through the SRFI process. This is too close to
> The big problem that many of us had with R6RS were the pieces where
> certain editors forced their own favorite "cool" but experimental ideas
> into the standard.
Where they became mandatory. This stuff is *not mandatory*.
--
Even the best of friends cannot John Cowan
attend each others' funeral. cowan@ccil.org
--Kehlog Albran, The Profit http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports