(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (23 Dec 2010 19:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching John Cowan (24 Dec 2010 03:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Peter Kourzanov (22 Dec 2010 20:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Thomas Bushnell, BSG (22 Dec 2010 21:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv? Eli Barzilay (22 Dec 2010 23:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching John Cowan 24 Dec 2010 03:21 UTC

Andre van Tonder scripsit:

>> It definitely will, probably either Taylor Campbell's or Olin Shivers's.
>> No :-) at all.
>
> Why?

Because WG2 so voted.  All of you had ample opportunity to join it,
but for whatever reason you couldn't or didn't, so you don't get a
vote at this point.

(If anyone wants to join now, let me know.  We could use warm blood.)

> have not even gone through the SRFI process.  This is too close to
> The big problem that many of us had with R6RS were the pieces where
> certain editors forced their own favorite "cool" but experimental ideas
> into the standard.

Where they became mandatory.  This stuff is *not mandatory*.

--
Even the best of friends cannot                 John Cowan
attend each others' funeral.                    cowan@ccil.org
        --Kehlog Albran, The Profit             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports