On 05/19/11 16:49, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Suggestion: replace every instance of "an unspecified value", "value is
> unspecified", "result is unspecified" and the like with "unspecified
> values".  This would permit the elegant approach of defining control
> constructs with no logical value to return 0 values.  This follows the
> R6RS.

I was keen to do away with the strange dependence on precisely one value
that was not specified, but it was voted to stick with a single
undefined value being returned from things!

See #68 at http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot2Results

> Andy

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports