Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Denis Washington (15 Oct 2011 07:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Jeronimo Pellegrini (15 Oct 2011 12:06 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Oct 2011 04:46 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (16 Oct 2011 21:08 UTC)
Re: Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Arthur A. Gleckler (17 Oct 2011 06:27 UTC)
[Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (16 Oct 2011 14:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (17 Oct 2011 06:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (17 Oct 2011 23:39 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (20 Oct 2011 12:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger (25 Oct 2011 00:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (25 Oct 2011 02:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (20 Oct 2011 08:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger (20 Oct 2011 17:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 17:46 UTC)
Re: Legacy caar to cddddr Arthur A. Gleckler (20 Oct 2011 17:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (20 Oct 2011 20:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 22:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (21 Oct 2011 02:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (22 Oct 2011 00:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 05:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (20 Oct 2011 17:52 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke (21 Oct 2011 02:34 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (21 Oct 2011 02:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (21 Oct 2011 02:56 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Grant Rettke (21 Oct 2011 20:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (22 Oct 2011 00:14 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (22 Oct 2011 14:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (22 Oct 2011 17:56 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (22 Oct 2011 19:15 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (22 Oct 2011 20:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 08:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (23 Oct 2011 19:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Denis Washington (22 Oct 2011 19:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (24 Oct 2011 00:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 05:39 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 08:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Jussi Piitulainen (23 Oct 2011 11:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (23 Oct 2011 15:16 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (23 Oct 2011 16:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (23 Oct 2011 18:14 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4 Jeronimo Pellegrini 15 Oct 2011 12:05 UTC

Hello,

I am willing to help review the draft if you send me (1)
and (2).

J.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:50:09PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> I have done what I think is all the editing required to take R7RS-small
> from draft 3 to draft 4, but there seems to be no one on the WG with
> the time right now to review it, so I can't publish the draft.  So I am
> appealing for volunteers from this list.
>
> Draft 4 is based on ballot 4, which is world-readable at
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot4Results .  The #nnn entries are
> links to the underlying tickets; crossed-out entries represent tickets
> that were rejected by the WG and are therefore not in the draft.
>
> The tickets that have not yet been implemented can be found at
> http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/query?status=decided&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=component&report=9&order=priority .
> Implementing them is *not* the thrust of this effort, only reviewing
> the others.  (Naturally, I won't scorn any patches for them that do arrive.)
>
> I can send each volunteer any or all of these:
>
> 1) A PDF of draft 4 as it stands
>
> 2) The LaTeX files for draft 4 as they stand
>
> 3) Diffs for the LaTex files between the published draft 3 and draft 4
>
> 4) A PDF made from latexdiff output (maybe -- I've never tried to do this)
>
> The conditions are to keep the materials private for the time being,
> and to send back critique by email in a reasonably timely fashion.
> This critique can either be related to the tickets or general editorial
> notes (typos, bogus content, etc.) but not change requests at this stage.
> Prose comments is fine, patches are better.
>
> --
> John Cowan  http://ccil.org/~cowan    cowan@ccil.org
> There are books that are at once excellent and boring.  Those that at
> once leap to the mind are Thoreau's Walden, Emerson's Essays, George
> Eliot's Adam Bede, and Landor's Dialogues.  --Somerset Maugham
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports