Stefan Edwards scripsit:

> "For any value that does not map to an operating system acceptable
> exit value, and is not a boolean, it is the recommendation of this
> report to treat it as a true conditional, for purposes of creating an
> exit value."

But that would be almost the reverse of the programmer's likely intent.
Whether it's (exit "bad arguments") on Windows or (exit 1) on Plan 9,
the intention of a random argument is almost certainly failure rather
than success, because as I said there is only one kind of success and
many kinds of failure.  So if anything uninterpretable arguments should
be mapped to #f.

--
One Word to write them all,             John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
  One Access to find them,              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
One Excel to count them all,
  And thus to Windows bind them.                --Mike Champion

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports