[Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
Yuichi Nishiwaki 29 Oct 2013 04:43 UTC
Hi, all. I'm very excited to see the final R7RS draft published. Thank
you all for the great work.
Reading the final draft, I have one question about the formal syntax
definition (7.1.1). <bytevector> is not listed in <token> line. Is it
by purpose? Or just a missing?
-- Yuichi Nishiwaki
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports